MacFAC: FACTORIAL ANALYSIS OF CORRESPONDENCE
****************************************
 image # 1 : i1
 image # 2 : i2
 image # 3 : i3
 image # 4 : i4
 image # 5 : i5
 image # 6 : i6
 image # 1: Min=3, Max=135, Mean=95, Tot=1.548882000e+06, Wght=0.165876
 image # 2: Min=27, Max=137, Mean=96, Tot=1.567963000e+06, Wght=0.167919
 image # 3: Min=2, Max=139, Mean=95, Tot=1.549923000e+06, Wght=0.165987
 image # 4: Min=3, Max=139, Mean=95, Tot=1.551086000e+06, Wght=0.166112
 image # 5: Min=30, Max=139, Mean=96, Tot=1.569981000e+06, Wght=0.168135
 image # 6: Min=3, Max=138, Mean=95, Tot=1.549778000e+06, Wght=0.165972
 Trace of the covariance matrix before diagonalisation = 1 + 1.5655990e-02
 Sum of the eigenvalues after diagonalisation = 1.000000 +   1.5655990e-02
 Difference = -5.454621e-16

              RESULTS

  Eigenvalues	Percentage	Percentage
                      of variance       total
   1.0000e+00
   6.9925e-03	       44.66	       44.66
   3.4595e-03	       22.10	       66.76
   1.7686e-03	       11.30	       78.06
   1.7487e-03	       11.17	       89.23
   1.6866e-03	       10.77	      100.00
 Only the 2 first axes seem significant

 Coordinates of the axes on the images
 axe # 0:     0.407278    0.409779    0.407415    0.407568    0.410043    0.407396
 axe # 1:    -0.503711   -0.003145    0.502258   -0.495852    0.002371    0.498124
 axe # 2:     0.284539   -0.571505    0.281296    0.295761   -0.580699    0.297668
 axe # 3:    -0.064555   -0.702658    0.084998    0.073224    0.694371   -0.085834
 axe # 4:     0.702341   -0.067562    0.062301   -0.701679    0.056896   -0.051775
 axe # 5:     0.044570   -0.084620   -0.701082   -0.053191    0.096230    0.698031

 Coordinates of the images on the 5 axes
 image # 1:    -0.103421    0.041092   -0.006666    0.072113    0.004494
 image # 2:    -0.000642   -0.082031   -0.072113   -0.006895   -0.008481
 image # 3:     0.103088    0.040610    0.008774    0.006395   -0.070670
 image # 4:    -0.101735    0.042683    0.007556   -0.071994   -0.005360
 image # 5:     0.000483   -0.083297    0.071217    0.005802    0.009638
 image # 6:     0.102244    0.042976   -0.008861   -0.005315    0.070366

 Building the factorial images:
 All the images have been multiplied by 52069.982374
  Statistics of image test_001.AXM: 
  Min = -32739 ,  Max = 32348 ,  Mean = 0
  Statistics of image test_002.AXM: 
  Min = -22923 ,  Max = 10190 ,  Mean = -101
  Statistics of image test_003.AXM: 
  Min = -10096 ,  Max = 11187 ,  Mean = -4
  Statistics of image test_004.AXM: 
  Min = -10952 ,  Max = 9227 ,  Mean = 2
  Statistics of image test_005.AXM: 
  Min = -10005 ,  Max = 12065 ,  Mean = 3

 Building filtered images:
 The following axes are kept: axis 1 axis 2 and also axis 0:
  Statistics of image test_001.RCM:
  Min = 5 ,  Max = 129 ,  Mean = 94
  Statistics of image test_002.RCM:
  Min = 35 ,  Max = 130 ,  Mean = 96
  Statistics of image test_003.RCM:
  Min = 5 ,  Max = 126 ,  Mean = 95
  Statistics of image test_004.RCM:
  Min = 5 ,  Max = 129 ,  Mean = 95
  Statistics of image test_005.RCM:
  Min = 34 ,  Max = 131 ,  Mean = 96
  Statistics of image test_006.RCM:
  Min = 4 ,  Max = 127 ,  Mean = 95

 Building a fictitious image:
 Coordinate on axis 1: -0.103421
 Coordinate on axis 2: 0.041092
 Axis 0 is NOT included
 Normalisation: 0.170000
  Statistics for this image test.FCM:
  Min = -69 ,  Max = 49 ,  Mean = 0
 12 images have been created